The Under-Review Divergence: Faros's Widening Crisis vs. CMU's Convergence

Resolves acceleration-whiplash's open question: the Faros-vs-CMU under-review 'divergence' is mostly measurement artifact — a vendor's adoption-depth *delta in unreviewed-PR count* over enterprise all-PRs vs a non-vendor *calendar-time share* of unreviewed agent PRs in open source — and both fit one story: total unreviewed output rises with volume while the share of agent PRs merged unchecked falls as teams learn risk-triage; the volume-concentration clause is supported (median per-project no-review ≈0%, pooled >50%; triage by PR type), and the residual disagreement is a forecast — whether triage discipline survives agentic authoring crossing from <1% to double digits